About

JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC DOCUMENTS FOR FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE

Description

In view of the increasing problems of fisheries all over the world, the study of fisheries and aquaculture with a local

attitude also incorporating global aspects has become a crucial element of scientific inquiry. Accordingly, JADFA is a

newly-founded print journal which aims to cover many aspects of fish and fisheries, water pollution, conservation,

biodiversity, distribution, taxonomy in aquatic habitats and related subjects. Papers with experimental content covering

contemporary concepts and issues in fisheries are especially welcome, as are those which integrate laboratory and field

works. The language of publication is English.

The journal will be published every four month in a year.

 

Aim and scope

The aim of the journal is to publish high-quality papers in the field of fish and fisheries.

Manuscript evaluation

The manuscript is initially checked against the JADFA requirements and then at least two peer-reviewers are

assigned for scientific evaluation. Typically, the manuscript will be reviewed and decision made within 2

months.

Manuscript preparation

The manuscript should be written in Times New Roman, 12 font size, double-spaced, and include the title,

author name (s), company or institute, e-mail and mailing address, abstract and key words. The main body of

a manuscript usually consists of introduction, material and methods, results, discussions, acknowledgement,

and references. A running title of no more Ethan 50 characters should be also provided.

Abstract should outline the objective, method, main results and conclusion, 150–300 words are appropriate.

 

Key words should be given in 3–7 items or phrases.

The Introduction should provide a clear statement of the problem, the relevant literature on the subject, and

the proposed approach or solution. It should be understandable to colleagues from a broad range of scientific

disciplines.

Materials and methods should be complete enough to allow experiments to be reproduced. However, only

truly new procedures should be described in detail; previously published procedures should be cited, and

important modifications of published procedures should be mentioned briefly. Capitalize trade names and

include the manufacturer's name and address. Subheadings should be used. Methods in general use need not

be described in detail.

Results should be presented with clarity and precision. The results should be written in the past tense when

describing findings in the authors' experiments. Previously published findings should be written in the

present tense. Results should be explained, but largely without referring to the literature. Discussion,

speculation and detailed interpretation of data should not be included in the Results but should be put into the

Discussion section.

Discussion should interpret the findings in view of the results obtained in this and in past studies on this

topic. State the conclusions in a few sentences at the end of the paper. The Results and Discussion sections

can include subheadings, and when appropriate, both sections can be combined.

Acknowledgments of people, grants, funds, etc should be brief.

 

Tables should be kept to a minimum and be designed to be as simple as possible. Tables are to be typed

double-spaced throughout, including headings and footnotes. Each table should be on a separate page,

numbered consecutively in Arabic numerals and supplied with a heading and a legend. Tables should be self-

explanatory without reference to the text. The details of the methods used in the experiments should

preferably be described in the legend instead of in the text. The same data should not be presented in both

table and graph form or repeated in the text.

Figure legends should be typed in numerical order on a separate sheet. Graphics should be prepared using

applications capable of generating high resolution GIF, TIFF, JPEG or Powerpoint before pasting in the

Microsoft Word manuscript file. Tables should be prepared in Microsoft Word. Use Arabic numerals to

designate figures and upper case letters for their parts (Figure 1). Begin each legend with a title and include

sufficient description so that the figure is understandable without reading the text of the manuscript.

Information given in legends should not be repeated in the text.

References

Only published or accepted manuscripts should be included in the reference list. Meetings, abstracts,

conference presentations or papers that have been submitted but not yet accepted should not be cited.

Limited citation of unpublished work should be included in the body of the text only.

Please use the following style for the reference list:

A reference identified by means of an author‘s name should be followed by the date of the reference in

parentheses in the text. When there are more than two authors, only the first author‘s name should be

mentioned, followed by ’et al‘. In the event that an author cited has had two or more works published during

the same year, the reference, both in the text and in the reference list, should be identified by a lower case

letter like ’a‘ and ’b‘ after the date to distinguish the works. References should be listed at the end of the

paper in alphabetical order.

Examples

Abayomi (2000), Agindotan et al. (2003), (Kelebeni 1983), (Kaya and Altında€ 2009), (Chege 1998,

Chukwura 1987a, b, Tijani 1993, 1995), (Kumasi et al. 2001).

Published Paper

Townsend CR, Thompson RM, McIntosh AR, Kilroy C, Edwards E, Scarsbrook MR, 1998,

Disturbance, resource supply, and food-web architecture in streams, Ecology Letters 1, 200-209.

Use of a DOI number to the full-text article is acceptable as an alternative to or in addition to traditional

volume and page numbers.

Electronic Journal Articles

Loker WM, 1996, Campesinos" and the crisis of modernization in Latin America, Jour Pol Ecol 3. Available:

http://www.library.arizona.edu/ej/jpe/volume_3/ascii-lokeriso.txt. Accessed 11 August 2006.

Books

Bates B, 1992, Bargaining for life: A social history of tuberculosis. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania

Press. 435.

Book Chapters

Hansen B, 1991, New York City epidemics and history for the public (In: Harden VA, Risse GB, editors,

AIDS and the historian) Bethesda, National Institutes of Health, 21-28.

Thesis

Emre N, 2010, Determination of helminth fauna on European Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L. 1758) in

Beymelek Lagoon, MSc Thesis, Süleyman Demirel University, Graduate School of NAS, 57.

Conference Proceedings

Koçer MAT, Emre Y, Kanyılmaz M, Sevgili H, Yuncer, ÖA, Durmaz S, Muhammedo€lu A, 2009, An

assessment on nitrogen and phosphorus forms in Eþen Stream (Fethiye, Mu€la), XV. National Fisheries

Symposium

(01-04 July, 2009, Rize, Turkey), 1-14.

Interested in submitting to this journal? We recommend that you review the About the Journal page for the journal's section policies, as well as the Author Guidelines. Authors need to register with the journal prior to submitting or, if already registered, can simply log in and begin the five-step process.We encourage readers to sign up for the publishing notification service for this journal. Use the Register link at the top of the home page for the journal. This registration will result in the reader receiving the Table of Contents by email for each new issue of the journal. This list also allows the journal to claim a certain level of support or readership. See the journal's Privacy Statement, which assures readers that their name and email address will not be used for other purposes.We encourage research librarians to list this journal among their library's electronic journal holdings. As well, it may be worth noting that this journal's open source publishing system is suitable for libraries to host for their faculty members to use with journals they are involved in editing (see Open Journal Systems).This journal permits and encourages authors to post items submitted to the journal on personal websites or institutional repositories both prior to and after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit, if applicable, its publication in this journal.4 times a yearThis journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.The copyediting stage is intended to improve the flow, clarity, grammar, wording, and formatting of the article. It represents the last chance for the author to make any substantial changes to the text because the next stage is restricted to typos and formatting corrections. The file to be copyedited is in Word or .rtf format and therefore can easily be edited as a word processing document. The set of instructions displayed here proposes two approaches to copyediting. One is based on Microsoft Word's Track Changes feature and requires that the copy editor, editor, and author have access to this program. A second system, which is software independent, has been borrowed, with permission, from the Harvard Educational Review. The journal editor is in a position to modify these instructions, so suggestions can be made to improve the process for this journal.

Copyediting Systems

1. Microsoft Word's Track Changes Under Tools in the menu bar, the feature Track Changes enables the copy editor to make insertions (text appears in color) and deletions (text appears crossed out in color or in the margins as deleted). The copy editor can posit queries to both the author (Author Queries) and to the editor (Editor Queries) by inserting these queries in square brackets. The copyedited version is then uploaded, and the editor is notified. The editor then reviews the text and notifies the author. The editor and author should leave those changes with which they are satisfied. If further changes are necessary, the editor and author can make changes to the initial insertions or deletions, as well as make new insertions or deletions elsewhere in the text. Authors and editors should respond to each of the queries addressed to them, with responses placed inside the square brackets. After the text has been reviewed by editor and author, the copy editor will make a final pass over the text accepting the changes in preparation for the layout and galley stage. 2. Harvard Educational Review Instructions for Making Electronic Revisions to the Manuscript Please follow the following protocol for making electronic revisions to your manuscript: Responding to suggested changes.   For each of the suggested changes that you accept, unbold the text.   For each of the suggested changes that you do not accept, re-enter the original text and bold it. Making additions and deletions.   Indicate additions by bolding the new text.   Replace deleted sections with: [deleted text].   If you delete one or more sentence, please indicate with a note, e.g., [deleted 2 sentences]. Responding to Queries to the Author (QAs).   Keep all QAs intact and bolded within the text. Do not delete them.   To reply to a QA, add a comment after it. Comments should be delimited using: [Comment:]   e.g., [Comment: Expanded discussion of methodology as you suggested]. Making comments.   Use comments to explain organizational changes or major revisions   e.g., [Comment: Moved the above paragraph from p. 5 to p. 7].  Note: When referring to page numbers, please use the page numbers from the printed copy of the manuscript that was sent to you. This is important since page numbers may change as a document is revised electronically.

An Illustration of an Electronic Revision

  1. Initial copyedit. The journal copy editor will edit the text to improve flow, clarity, grammar, wording, and formatting, as well as including author queries as necessary. Once the initial edit is complete, the copy editor will upload the revised document through the journal Web site and notify the author that the edited manuscript is available for review.
  2. Author copyedit. Before making dramatic departures from the structure and organization of the edited manuscript, authors must check in with the editors who are co-chairing the piece. Authors should accept/reject any changes made during the initial copyediting, as appropriate, and respond to all author queries. When finished with the revisions, authors should rename the file from AuthorNameQA.doc to AuthorNameQAR.doc (e.g., from LeeQA.doc to LeeQAR.doc) and upload the revised document through the journal Web site as directed.
  3. Final copyedit. The journal copy editor will verify changes made by the author and incorporate the responses to the author queries to create a final manuscript. When finished, the copy editor will upload the final document through the journal Web site and alert the layout editor to complete formatting.

Last Update Time: 3/25/16, 5:37:10 PM