Research Article

Comparison of the efficacy of two phenotypic identification kits and classic PCR methods to identify Aeromonas hydrophila isolated from fish farms

Volume: 6 Number: 2 April 12, 2023
EN

Comparison of the efficacy of two phenotypic identification kits and classic PCR methods to identify Aeromonas hydrophila isolated from fish farms

Abstract

In recent years, phenotypic identification kits have been reported to give incorrect results in identifying Aeromonas species, whereas molecular identification is quite reliable. In this context, Aeromonas hydrophila strains, isolated from fish farms (9 strains), identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method, and ATCC strain bacteria were used in the present study for the determination of the usability of API 20NE and Microgen GN-ID A + B panel test kits. All strains were determined as A. hydrophila in molecular methods. After phenotypic identification, a 100% accuracy rate was obtained for A. hydrophila with API 20NE. In the Microgen GN-ID A + B, these rates were 60% for the strains used in this study. Phenotypic identification for the ATCC strain in both kits was correct. This study showed that the API 20NE test kit had high validation for the rapid and correct identification of fish pathogenic A. hydrophila.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

This study was funded by the Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Research Project Fund

Project Number

FYL-2019-1023

References

  1. Altinok, I., Kurt, I., (2003). Molecular diagnosis of fish diseases: a Review. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 3(2), 131-138.
  2. Austin, B., Austin, D.A. (2010). Bacterial fish pathogens: diseases of farmed and wild fish, 4. Edition Springer Publishing, New York. ISBN: 978-1-4020-6068-7
  3. Awong-Taylor, J., Craven, K.S., Griffiths, L., Bass, C., Muscarella, M. (2007). Comparison of biochemical and molecular methods for the identification of bacterial isolates associated with failed loggerhead sea turtle eggs. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 104, 1244-1251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03650.x
  4. Dubey S., Maiti B., Girisha S.K., Das R., Lamkhannat M., Mutoloki S., Chen S.C Karunasagar I., Evensen Ø., Munang´andu H.M. (2021). Aeromonas species obtained from different farmed aquatic species in India and Taiwan show high phenotypic relatedness despite species diversity, BMC Research Notes, 14, 313. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05716-3
  5. Fernández-Bravo, A., Figueras, M.J. (2020). An Update on the Genus Aeromonas: Taxonomy, Epidemiology, and Pathogenicity, Microorganisms, 8, 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8010129
  6. Gülaydın, O., Özturk, C., Önalan, S., Karapınar, Z., Arabacı, M., Ekin, I.H., İlhan, Z., Gürtürk, K., İlhan, F. (2018). The investigation of the presence of some bacterial and viral agents in pearl mullet (Chalcalburnus tarichii, Pallas 1811) by Real-Time PCR and the histopathological examination. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 27(12), 8286-8296.
  7. Jin L., Chen Y., Yang W., Qiao Z., Zhang X. (2020). Complete genome sequence of fish-pathogenic Aeromonas hydrophila HX-3 and a comparative analysis: insights into virulence factors and quorum sensing, Scientific Reports, 10, 15479. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72484-8
  8. Kayis, S., Er, A., Yilmaz, C., Duzgun, A., Kose, O., Kurtoglu, I.Z. (2015). Aeromonas hydrophila as a causative agent of blue sac fry syndrome in different trout species. Journal of Fish Diseases, 38(12), 1069-1071. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.12326

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Hydrobiology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

April 12, 2023

Submission Date

January 31, 2023

Acceptance Date

April 5, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 6 Number: 2

APA
Balcı, Ş., Er, A., İpek, Z. Z., & Kayış, Ş. (2023). Comparison of the efficacy of two phenotypic identification kits and classic PCR methods to identify Aeromonas hydrophila isolated from fish farms. Aquatic Research, 6(2), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.3153/AR23013

16291
 

is licensed under a CreativeCommons Attribtion-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence 14628   1325927040

Diamond Open Access refers to a scholarly publication model in which journals and platforms do not charge fees to either authors or readers.
 

Open Access Statement:

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

Archiving Policy:

Archiving is done according to TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM "DergiPark" publication policy (LOCKSS).