Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Adana bölgesinden selekte edilen dikenli incirlerin meyve özelliklerinin belirlenmesi

Year 2016, Volume: 31 Issue: 2, 183 - 190, 18.07.2016

Mehmet Tütüncü Abdulkadir Sarıer Burhanettin İmrak Songül Çömlekçioğlu Ali Küden Ayzin Baykam Küden

https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.260973
Cited By: 3

Abstract

Bu çalışma Adana bölgesinden seçilen otuz bir dikenli incir genotipinin pomolojik özelliklerini belirlemek için gerçekleştirilmiştir. 2012 ve 2013 yıllarında seleksiyonu yapılan genotiplerden doğal ortamlarında meyveler toplanmış ve on farklı meyve özelliği kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Genotiplerin değerlendirilmesinde tartılı derecelendirme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, ortalama meyve ağırlığı 80 g, meyve başına ortalama tohum sayısı 240, seçilen genotiplerde meyve şekli genel olarak eliptik (%64.74) olarak bulunmuştur. Meyve kabuğunun soyulma zorluğu orta (%54.83) olarak sınıflandırılmıştır. Genotiplerin suda çözünebilir kuru madde miktarı %7 ile %17, pH 5.17-7.36 arasında bulunmuştur. Titre edilebilir asitlik genotipe bağlı olarak önemli farklılık göstermiş ve %1.94 ile %9.08 arasında bulunmuştur. Basit derecelendirme yöntemi sonucunda 01 OP 19 no.lu genotip en yüksek puanı almıştır.

Keywords

Opuntia pomoloji;dikenli incir; seleksiyon; basit derecelendirme yöntemi

References

  • Anonymous, 2014. Dikenli incirin 400 tanesi, 12 liradan satılıyor. http://www.ascihaber.com/v4/haber/devam.asp?haber_id=9221 (Access Date: 11.12.2015).
  • Balık, H.I., Beyhan, N., 2014. Ordu’nun Ünye ilçesinde Palaz fındık çeşidinin klon seleksiyonu. Anadolu J Agr Sci, 29(3): 179-185.
  • Bekir, E.A., 2006. Cactus pear (Opuntia fıcus-indica Mill.) in Turkey: growing regions and pomological traits of cactus pear fruits. Acta Hort., 728: 51-54.
  • Berger, H., Rodriguez-Felix, A., Galletti, L., 2013. Field operations and utilization of cactus cladodes. Agro-Industrial Utilizations of Cactus Pear, FAO, Rome, p. 21-29.
  • Cantwell, M., 1986. Post-harvest aspects of prickly pear fruits and vegetable cladodes. In perishables handling, post-harvest technology of fresh horticultural crops. Cooperative extension, University of California, 59: 6-9.
  • Chipeta, M., 2010. Keynote address (Nefzaoui, A., Inglese, P., Belay, T., Eds). Improved utilization of cactus pear for food, feed, soil and water conservation and other products in Africa. Proceedings of International Workshop, Mekelle (Ethiopia), p. 10-11.
  • Corral-Aguayo, R..D., Yahia, E.M., Carillo-Lopez, A., Gonzalez-Aguilar, G., 2008. Correlation between some nutritional components and the total antioxidant capacity measured with six different assays in eight horticultural crops. J. Agric. Food. Chem., 56: 10498-10504.
  • De Wit, M., Nel, P., Osthoff, G., Labuschange, M.T., 2010. The effect of variety and location on cactus pear (Opuntia ficus – indica) fruit quality. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr., 65: 136-145.
  • Duru, B., Türker, N., 2005. Changes in physical properties and chemical composition of cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) during maturation. J Prof Assoc Cactus. 22-33.
  • FAO, 2013. Agro-industrial utilization of cactus pear. Rome. www.fao.org/docrep/019/a0534e/a0534e.pdf (Access: 11.12.2015)
  • Galati, E.M., Mondello, M.R., Giuffrida, D., Dugo, G., Miceli, N., Pergolizzi, S., Taviano, M.F., 2003. Chemical characterization and biological effects of Sicilian Opuntia ficus indica (L.) Mill. fruit juice: antioxidant and anti-ulcerogenic activity J. Agric. Food Chem., 51: 4903-4908.
  • Greenway, H.T., Pratt, S.G., 2001. Fruit and vegetable micronutrients in diseases of the eye. In vegetable, fruits, and herbs in health promotion (Watson, R. R., Ed.). CRC Press: Boca Raton pp 85-98.
  • Inglese, P., 2009. Cactus pear: gift of the new world. Chronica Hortic., 49(1): 15.
  • Karaçali, I., 2012. Bahçe ürünlerinin muhafaza ve pazarlanması. Sekizinci Baskı. Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi. İzmir. p. 486.
  • Lopez, J.L., 2007. Use of Opuntia cactus as a hypoglycemic agent in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus among Mexican American patients. Nutrient Bytes, 12(1): 1-7.
  • Mashope, B.K., 2007. Characterization of cactus pear germplasm in Southern Africa, http//:etd.uovs.ac.za/ETD-db/theses/available/etd.../MashopeBK.pdf (Access Date: 11.12.2015).
  • Mejia, A., Cantwell, M., 2003. Prickly pear fruit development and quality in relation to gibberellic acid applications to intact and emasculated flower buds. J Prof Assoc Cactus, 72-85.
  • Mondrogon-Jacobo, C., Bordelon, B.B., 1996. Cactus pear (Opuntia spp. Cactaceae) breeding for fruit production. J Prof Assoc Cactus, pp. 19.
  • Shahidi, F., 1997. Natural antioxidants: An overview in natural antioxidants: chemistry, health effects, and applications. (Shahidi, F., Editor). AOCS Press: Champaign, IL, pp 1-11.
  • Toplu, C., Serce, S., Ercisli, S., Kamiloglu, O., Memnune, S., 2009. Phenotypic variation in physico-chemical properties among cactus pear fruits (Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller) from Turkey. Phcog Mag., 5(20): 400-406.
  • Nefzaoui, A., El-Mourid, M., Salah, C., 2009. ICARDA and FAO-CACTUSNET collaborate to promote cactus (Opuntia ficus indica) for rangeland ımprovement and to combat desertification. Cactusnet Newsletter, 9: 28-33.
  • Weiss, J., Nerd, A., Mizrahi, Y., 1993. Vegetative parthenocarpy in the cactus pear Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. Annals of Botany, 72: 521-526.

Determination of fruit characteristics of cactus pear selected from Adana province

Year 2016, Volume: 31 Issue: 2, 183 - 190, 18.07.2016

Mehmet Tütüncü Abdulkadir Sarıer Burhanettin İmrak Songül Çömlekçioğlu Ali Küden Ayzin Baykam Küden

https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.260973
Cited By: 3

Abstract

The study was performed on thirty one cactus pear genotypes selected from Adana province in Turkey to determine their pomological characteristics. Fruits of selected genotypes were collected from their natural sites in 2012 and 2013 and the fruit characteristics were evaluated by using ten different fruit traits. The results showed that the average fruit weight was about 80 g, the average seed number per fruit was 240 and the fruit shape of the selected genotypes was generally elliptical (64.74%). Ease of fruit peeling were classified as medium (54.83%). Total Soluble Solids (TSS) of the genotypes were determined between 7% and 15% and the pH value was between 5.17 and 7.36. Titratable acidity content (TA) was found to be significantly different in a genotype-dependent way and acidity varied between 1.94% and 9.08%. The simplified scoring method was used to evaluate the selected genotypes and the genotype of 01 OP 19 gave the highest score.

Keywords

Opuntia pomology; prickly pear; selection; weighted ranked method

References

  • Anonymous, 2014. Dikenli incirin 400 tanesi, 12 liradan satılıyor. http://www.ascihaber.com/v4/haber/devam.asp?haber_id=9221 (Access Date: 11.12.2015).
  • Balık, H.I., Beyhan, N., 2014. Ordu’nun Ünye ilçesinde Palaz fındık çeşidinin klon seleksiyonu. Anadolu J Agr Sci, 29(3): 179-185.
  • Bekir, E.A., 2006. Cactus pear (Opuntia fıcus-indica Mill.) in Turkey: growing regions and pomological traits of cactus pear fruits. Acta Hort., 728: 51-54.
  • Berger, H., Rodriguez-Felix, A., Galletti, L., 2013. Field operations and utilization of cactus cladodes. Agro-Industrial Utilizations of Cactus Pear, FAO, Rome, p. 21-29.
  • Cantwell, M., 1986. Post-harvest aspects of prickly pear fruits and vegetable cladodes. In perishables handling, post-harvest technology of fresh horticultural crops. Cooperative extension, University of California, 59: 6-9.
  • Chipeta, M., 2010. Keynote address (Nefzaoui, A., Inglese, P., Belay, T., Eds). Improved utilization of cactus pear for food, feed, soil and water conservation and other products in Africa. Proceedings of International Workshop, Mekelle (Ethiopia), p. 10-11.
  • Corral-Aguayo, R..D., Yahia, E.M., Carillo-Lopez, A., Gonzalez-Aguilar, G., 2008. Correlation between some nutritional components and the total antioxidant capacity measured with six different assays in eight horticultural crops. J. Agric. Food. Chem., 56: 10498-10504.
  • De Wit, M., Nel, P., Osthoff, G., Labuschange, M.T., 2010. The effect of variety and location on cactus pear (Opuntia ficus – indica) fruit quality. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr., 65: 136-145.
  • Duru, B., Türker, N., 2005. Changes in physical properties and chemical composition of cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) during maturation. J Prof Assoc Cactus. 22-33.
  • FAO, 2013. Agro-industrial utilization of cactus pear. Rome. www.fao.org/docrep/019/a0534e/a0534e.pdf (Access: 11.12.2015)
  • Galati, E.M., Mondello, M.R., Giuffrida, D., Dugo, G., Miceli, N., Pergolizzi, S., Taviano, M.F., 2003. Chemical characterization and biological effects of Sicilian Opuntia ficus indica (L.) Mill. fruit juice: antioxidant and anti-ulcerogenic activity J. Agric. Food Chem., 51: 4903-4908.
  • Greenway, H.T., Pratt, S.G., 2001. Fruit and vegetable micronutrients in diseases of the eye. In vegetable, fruits, and herbs in health promotion (Watson, R. R., Ed.). CRC Press: Boca Raton pp 85-98.
  • Inglese, P., 2009. Cactus pear: gift of the new world. Chronica Hortic., 49(1): 15.
  • Karaçali, I., 2012. Bahçe ürünlerinin muhafaza ve pazarlanması. Sekizinci Baskı. Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi. İzmir. p. 486.
  • Lopez, J.L., 2007. Use of Opuntia cactus as a hypoglycemic agent in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus among Mexican American patients. Nutrient Bytes, 12(1): 1-7.
  • Mashope, B.K., 2007. Characterization of cactus pear germplasm in Southern Africa, http//:etd.uovs.ac.za/ETD-db/theses/available/etd.../MashopeBK.pdf (Access Date: 11.12.2015).
  • Mejia, A., Cantwell, M., 2003. Prickly pear fruit development and quality in relation to gibberellic acid applications to intact and emasculated flower buds. J Prof Assoc Cactus, 72-85.
  • Mondrogon-Jacobo, C., Bordelon, B.B., 1996. Cactus pear (Opuntia spp. Cactaceae) breeding for fruit production. J Prof Assoc Cactus, pp. 19.
  • Shahidi, F., 1997. Natural antioxidants: An overview in natural antioxidants: chemistry, health effects, and applications. (Shahidi, F., Editor). AOCS Press: Champaign, IL, pp 1-11.
  • Toplu, C., Serce, S., Ercisli, S., Kamiloglu, O., Memnune, S., 2009. Phenotypic variation in physico-chemical properties among cactus pear fruits (Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller) from Turkey. Phcog Mag., 5(20): 400-406.
  • Nefzaoui, A., El-Mourid, M., Salah, C., 2009. ICARDA and FAO-CACTUSNET collaborate to promote cactus (Opuntia ficus indica) for rangeland ımprovement and to combat desertification. Cactusnet Newsletter, 9: 28-33.
  • Weiss, J., Nerd, A., Mizrahi, Y., 1993. Vegetative parthenocarpy in the cactus pear Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. Annals of Botany, 72: 521-526.
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Horticultural Sciences
Authors

Mehmet Tütüncü

Abdulkadir Sarıer This is me

Burhanettin İmrak This is me

Songül Çömlekçioğlu This is me

Ali Küden

Ayzin Baykam Küden

Publication Date July 18, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 31 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Tütüncü, M., Sarıer, A., İmrak, B., Çömlekçioğlu, S., et al. (2016). Adana bölgesinden selekte edilen dikenli incirlerin meyve özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 31(2), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.260973
AMA Tütüncü M, Sarıer A, İmrak B, Çömlekçioğlu S, Küden A, Küden AB. Adana bölgesinden selekte edilen dikenli incirlerin meyve özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. ANAJAS. August 2016;31(2):183-190. doi:10.7161/omuanajas.260973
Chicago Tütüncü, Mehmet, Abdulkadir Sarıer, Burhanettin İmrak, Songül Çömlekçioğlu, Ali Küden, and Ayzin Baykam Küden. “Adana bölgesinden Selekte Edilen Dikenli Incirlerin Meyve özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi”. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 31, no. 2 (August 2016): 183-90. https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.260973.
EndNote Tütüncü M, Sarıer A, İmrak B, Çömlekçioğlu S, Küden A, Küden AB (August 1, 2016) Adana bölgesinden selekte edilen dikenli incirlerin meyve özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 31 2 183–190.
IEEE M. Tütüncü, A. Sarıer, B. İmrak, S. Çömlekçioğlu, A. Küden, and A. B. Küden, “Adana bölgesinden selekte edilen dikenli incirlerin meyve özelliklerinin belirlenmesi”, ANAJAS, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 183–190, 2016, doi: 10.7161/omuanajas.260973.
ISNAD Tütüncü, Mehmet et al. “Adana bölgesinden Selekte Edilen Dikenli Incirlerin Meyve özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi”. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 31/2 (August 2016), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.260973.
JAMA Tütüncü M, Sarıer A, İmrak B, Çömlekçioğlu S, Küden A, Küden AB. Adana bölgesinden selekte edilen dikenli incirlerin meyve özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. ANAJAS. 2016;31:183–190.
MLA Tütüncü, Mehmet et al. “Adana bölgesinden Selekte Edilen Dikenli Incirlerin Meyve özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi”. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 31, no. 2, 2016, pp. 183-90, doi:10.7161/omuanajas.260973.
Vancouver Tütüncü M, Sarıer A, İmrak B, Çömlekçioğlu S, Küden A, Küden AB. Adana bölgesinden selekte edilen dikenli incirlerin meyve özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. ANAJAS. 2016;31(2):183-90.

Cited By

Sensory, morphological, biochemical, and antioxidant characteristics of the fruits of different Cactus Pear (Opuntia ficus-indica Mill.) genotypes
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-023-01673-x
Tarsus ve Karaisalı Bölgelerindeki Doğal Frenk İnciri (Opuntia ficus-indica) Popülasyonunun Ön Tanılaması
Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.24180/ijaws.1152389
Muğla Yöresinden Selekte Edilen Dikenli İncir (Opuntia ficus-indica L.) Genotiplerinin Agromorfolojik ve Pomolojik Karakterizasyonu
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1073982
 Download Cover Image
Online ISSN: 1308-8769